H.G. Wells’s narrator in FMM asks, ‘How can I describe the thing I saw?’
Explore how two of the module authors experiment with form and/or content in their writing
The rise of modernism at the start of the 20th century led authors such as HG Wells and Virginia Woolf to experiment with form and content. Wells wrote ‘scientific romance’, the predecessor to modern science fiction as a form of pro-science, anti-colonial propaganda, and Virginia Woolf used stream-of-consciousness and free indirect speech, with the plot moving forward by using a series of flashbacks from different characters to give the reader a more true representation of time and space. Both authors used their work to look at new ideas in science, and both authors also used their work as a platform for political and sociological ideas.
After the turn of the century, Ezra Pound’s declaration was to ‘make it new’. ‘Modernism famously invents itself by imagining the new century as a rupture from the past (Hale, 2009)’. Both Wells and Woolf were trying to make something new with their work. They both famously had strong opinions on what the Modern Novel should be.
Woolf declared that Fielding and Austen’s ‘masterpieces certainly have a strange air of simplicity (1919)’ in her essays. She thought the modern novel ‘should attempt to come closer to life, and to preserve more sincerely and exactly what interests and moves [the characters] even if...they must discard most of the conventions which are commonly observed by the novelist.’ Both writers wanted to create something new, to carve their own ideas about what a novel should be on the new literary landscape after the turn of the century, and on the surface, it appears that they have similar ideas on where the novel should go. However, the distinction between the two is that while Wells, in the First Men in The Moon, deals with the ideas of the external, expounding his opinions on socialism, capitalism and his ideas about specialization, Woolf deals with the internal, a stream of consciousness and the psychological aspects of the mind and the mechanisation of time.
Wells did not claim to be a modernist; however, his essay The Contemporary Novel shifts the perspective from the 19th century’s reader, the ‘weary giant’ to a new perspective. He declared that the 19th century novel was pandering to the weary giant, a man who ‘doesn't want ideas, he doesn't want facts; above all, he doesn't want Problems’ (1911). He did not want art for art’s sake, claiming ’the novelist is going to be the most potent of artists’. He viewed the novel as a vehicle for social change. He ‘always wrote as a moralist, concerned with man’s place among the mystery of Nature, or the social implications of mastering them (Mackenzie, Mackenzie, 1973)’. Wells wanted to write about the whole of human experience, using his didactic literature as a way of setting examples to the reader.
Modern critics have drawn parallels between Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels and Well’s First Men in the Moon, as both writers use an ‘encounter with other rational species for the double purpose of satirizing the condition of our own species and attacking Western presumptions to the right of dominion over "idolatrous and barbarous People"’(Schwartz, 2003). Wells is playing with notions of specialisation, which he also looked at in Anticipations. This book was published in the same year as The First Men in the Moon, a treatise on what Wells thought the new world order should be. In it, he discusses a range of subject, starting with his ideas about travel, which is mirrored in Cavor’s sphere, and Bedford’s ideas about how Cavorite will revolutionise ‘shipping, locomotion, every conceivable form of human industry’. He talks of specialisation, which is seen in the Selenites hierarchal community structure, and also in the roles played by Bedford, the unfeeling capitalist, and Cavor, the scientist who is incapable of applying his knowledge to the society he lives in.
‘He admitted in a letter to Churchill, that in ‘‘The First Men in the Moon... I have been giving the specialise sort to the best of my abilities.’ This passage reveals that Wells intended the Selenites... to satirise specialisation. (McClean, 2009).’ Wells is examining theories about Social Darwinism in looking at specialisation. ‘Social Darwinism applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to the understanding of human society; it necessitates that individuals succeed or dominate because of their inherent superiority (Blake, 1998)’. When Cavor has told the Grand Lunar of humanity’s love of war, with ‘battle the most glorious experience of life’, he is soon stopped from sending any more messages. The cut off ‘I was mad to let the Grand Lunar know... ’ is taken to mean ‘about war’. Wells wrote First Men in the Moon as the Boer War was ending, and the colonisation of Africa no doubt influenced his writing when the two main characters are the first explorers of a dark new world, ‘the wildest and most desolate scenes.’ Bedford, after being captured, sets on his captors and attacks them. ‘My mailed hand seemed to go right through him.’ Wells is commenting here on the aggression on the British Empire. If we examine the First Men in the Moon, we can see Well’s unfavourable opinions on colonialism. In this era, colonialism was seen as a necessity, to’ improve the noble savage’. ‘The belief in the superiority of Europe, and the existence of the ‘lower races’ (Pennycook, 1998)’ was widespread. Wells is shifting the perspective on this notion. To the Selenites, humanity is the ‘lower race’. Bedford assumes that Cavor is dead at the end of the novel, once again driving home the point that humans are obsessed with death and war.
Many of Wells’ ideas are drawn from scientific theories from the turn of the century. Wells studied science under the tutelage of TS Huxley. His books are a break with the traditional explanation of magic used in the 19th century novel. Instead, he uses his knowledge to explain science. Steve McClean (2009) points out that Wells called the First Men in the Moon ‘his best scientific romance... the writer has allowed himself no liberties with known facts ’. Wells was using his novel to popularise innovative technology from the turn of the century. When Cavor is talking to Bedford, he explains science in terms even a nonprofessional can understand, ‘Radiant energy, he made me understand, was anything like light or heat or those Rontgen rays there was so much talk about a year or so ago.’
The scene where Bedford and Cavor first land on the moon is a perfect example of Wells’ use of metaphor and description. It is poetic. He uses biblical allegory, comparing the plant growth to ‘the tree and plants [that] arose at the creation and covered the desolation of the new-made earth.’ Even in his descriptions, he uses scientific details, ‘Have you ever on a cold day taken a thermometer into your warm hand and watched the little thread of mercury creep up the tube? These moon plants grew like that.’
However, his characters are much less complex. His characterisation of Bedford and Cavor is satirical, and the characters are unflattering caricatures of the Scientist and the Capitalist. Cavor is depicted as an almost cartoonish character. Wells uses a typical view of the scientist to describe him. ‘He was a short, round-bodied, thin-legged little man, with a jerky quality in his motions; he had seen fit to clothe his extraordinary mind in a cricket cap, an overcoat, and cycling knickerbockers and stockings. Why he did so I do not know, for he never cycled and he never played cricket.’ Bedford is young, and has been foolish with his money in the past, ‘even when I had got out of everything, one cantankerous creditor saw fit to be malignant.’ We do not like Bedford, he admits that he is a liar and a thief within the first few pages, ‘a trustful baker came each day...I was a little sorry for [him].’ In creating such an unlikeable main character for the first part of the novel, Wells is setting us up for second part, where Bedford is transcribing the messages sent from the moon, we feel distrustful of what he is saying. ‘Looking back over my previously written account of these things, I must insist that I have been altogether juster to Cavor than he has been to me. I have extenuated little and suppressed nothing.’ Bedford is asking the reader to take his version as true but in doing so, he cast doubt in our minds. He goes on to say ‘I am quite willing to let the reader between us on what he has before him.’ This technique, almost an apostrophe, like when Bedford is telling the reader to ‘imagine it!’ when describing the moon’s flora after they land, throws us out of the story and makes us think about it from the outside perspective. Wells is telling us to read between the lines. It is when the novel changes from Bedford’s first story to his recounting Cavor’s radio messages we can see what Wells’ called the ‘splintering frame’ later in his life. The idea is that the novel is a frame through which we view the written world. It should not just be rigid or one frame, but many frames, cubism of literature. It was ‘designed (A) to frustrate expectations aroused by [literary] conventions, (B) to draw attention to the artificiality of and ideology behind these conventions, and (C) to point away from the ‘exhausted’ text as a self-contained finished artefact and towards the self-aware reader (Scheick, 1984)’.
Woolf was very much a modernist. She was inspired by James Joyce, talking about him in her essay Modern Fiction, impressed with his ‘attempt to come closer to life, and to preserve more sincerely and exactly what interests and moves [him], even if to do so [he] must discard most of the conventions which are commonly observed by the novelist.’ Ulysses, Joyce’s masterpiece had a great effect on Woolf. It is one of the most highly regarded Modernist novels, and it’s publishing, in the same year as Eliot’s The Waste Land marks the beginning of what is known as the High Modernist period. Woolf is also considered one of the High Modernists. She called the modernist period ‘an age of fragments’ in her essay How it Strikes a Contemporary, and this can be seen in her writing. The novel is made up of collective moments where we see an event through the eyes of many people. When Clarissa is walking to buy flowers, we are inside her head, then the texts jumps into that of a man driving past who looks at her and we get a description of her, ‘a touch of the bird about her’. Woolf, like Wells, was also trying to write about the whole of human experience, but instead of doing it from an external perspective, she chose the internal.
Clarissa’s interior world is the reality we see in her character. She says, ‘this body she wore... with all its capacities seemed nothing – nothing at all. She had the oddest sense of being herself invisible; unseen; unknown.’ Inside her head, she is introspective and it is here we get a full understanding of her character. Her external world is shallow, full of parties, dinners, and mixing with high society and yet her interior world is rich in complex thoughts and emotions. Her relationship with Peter and the lesbian encounter with Sally Sexton show us that there is more to Mrs Dalloway than meets the external eye. Littleton (1995) states; ‘Woolf criticizes conceptions of character bound by the exterior forms of life: the whole complex (job, family, assets) that fixes every person firmly in the world of business and power relationships. Against this system, Woolf places a world of private significance whose meaning is wholly irreducible to facts of the external world ’. In seeing inside the characters head, we can have a more complete understanding of not just that character, but life itself. It is anti-essentialist in that Woolf is exploring the concepts in a society ruled by class, and showing us that people in post-war London were not as bound by the rigidity of the Victorian era, which the modernists were trying to break away from. Woolf draws her ideas about psychology from modern scientific thought on the subject. In Mrs Dalloway, she is using stream-of-consciousness, a method of writing incorporating William James’ ideas on the mind, first used as a consistent narrative method by Dorothy Richardson in Pointed Roofs in 1915 (Balakrishnan, 2006). This technique is effective at giving us the duality between the internal and external world. Peter accuses Clarissa of being shallow, and yet the reader can see how reflective she really is. This difference, this breakdown in communication with the interior and exterior world is reminiscent of Wells’ splintering frame, and Woolf takes the cubism of this idea even further in the crossing of all the major and minor characters thoughts. Woolf was trying to represent the strangeness of the stream of consciousness in its splintered and fractured train. Woolf uses events seen by many people as a way of jumping between characters thoughts.
Septimus, the soldier who is suffering from shell shock is an outlet for Woolf to discuss her views on a number of issues. Woolf famously suffered from mental illness, and suffered at the hands of the doctors who were treating her. She uses Septimus as a platform to air her views about the treatment of the mentally ill. When Doctor William Bradshaw visits Septimus, he is diagnosed after the briefest of examinations as being ‘in a funk’ and the cure is a long stint in bed, at one of Doctor Holmes’s rest homes, another name for an asylum. Bradshaw says he is not suffering from madness, merely ‘not having a sense of proportion’. This is despite the fact he is talking to his dead friend Evans, has threatened suicide and is hearing the birds speaking to him in Greek, something which Woolf wrote about as happening to her in her diaries is. Septimus’s treatment by the doctor, his refusal to see him shows us Woolf’s unfavourable opinions on the mental health system at the time, especially following the First World War, where many soldiers returned home with what we would now call post traumatic stress disorder. It is because of the doctor, ‘the repulsive brute, with the blood red nostrils’, that Septimus feels he has to escape. His suicide acts as the only way he can escape. ‘Septimus[...]believes that he has a mission to "change the world" and "renew society" With these eccentricities, Septimus[ ...] cannot survive in a social Darwinist world (Blake, 1998).’ However, Septimus’s viewpoint is similar to that of Woolf herself. The modernists wanted to do as Septimus wants, to ‘change the world, and ‘renew society.’ Perhaps in Septimus’s despair, we can see glimmerings of Woolf’s own.
Septimus also serves to show us Woolf’s opinion on war. In 1916 at the Battle of the Somme, England lost 60,000 young men. England may have won the war, but the cost was too great, and it was the end of the First World War that lead to the British Empire beginning to crumble. It may have been 1947 when the first country declared their independence from the empire, but the cracks in society had started long before. The characters that are pro-empire in Mrs Dalloway are old, and Aunt Helena’s glass eye serves as a way of showing us that the old ways are blind to the faults of colonialism. Politics directly appear in Mrs Dalloway in the character of Richard, her husband and a Member of Parliament. However, his apparent disillusionment with the system and his problems with the ‘detestable social system’ show Woolf’s dissatisfaction with it too. ‘Coming from a politician, this contempt towards the entire social body and its institutions seems to express the loss of a political idealism and a will to affect the whole of society (Garcia, 2010).’
Unlike Wells, who is direct and succinct in his writing and propaganda methods, Woolf uses subtle motifs and recurring images to move the story forward and to plant emotions in the readers head. The use of trees and flowers is symbolic in Mrs Dalloway, as a way of address the central issues themes. Cut flowers are used to symbolise death, and in post-war London, death would have been a major issue, with nearly a whole generation of men wiped out by the war. While Clarissa can go buy flowers for her party, Luiza can only buy ‘half dead roses’, and Septimus imagines ‘flowers[grow] through his chest’. This highlights both Septimus’s madness, and he and his wife’s position in society. ‘For Woolf, cut flowers are the trace of nature to the city, and a nostalgic connection to the past (Collett, 2009).’ While the events take place in one day, the novel portrays time as fractured, with many scenes of the past appearing in the characters thoughts. Time is another key theme in the book, ‘the leaden circles dissolve in the air’, and Woolf is commenting on how while the chimes of Big Ben many appear in everyone’s consciousness, the effect it has is different as we all occupy different realms of thought.
Wells’ fantastical dystopian novel is simple to read, and easy to critique. He did not want to distort his message with allusions and instead wanted to make the novel enjoyable to read but with a clear political message, whereas Woolf’s novel is a complex trench with over 100 minor and major characters, and difficult to read free indirect speech. Woolf disliked Wells’ method of writing, saying ‘In order to complete [Wells’ books] it seems necessary to do something—to join a society, or […] to write a cheque (1950)’ and ‘[…] [the Edwardians] spend immense skill and immense industry making the trivial and the transitory appear the true and enduring’ (1984). However, the same can be said of Woolf’s work, with its looks at the everyday chores of going shopping, doctor’s visits, and having parties. Woolf uses much subtler didactic methods. Both writers wanted to write a kind of truth, and both writers succeed, albeit in very different ways. Without Wells taking ‘one small step for man’, creating a new kind of novel with his scientific romances, and showing his version of the truth, with ‘all life within the scope of the novel’, it would have been very difficult for Woolf to take her ‘one giant leap for mankind’, in creating her version of High Modernist art, encapsulating all manner of human thought and emotions.
Bibliography
Balakrishnan, G. (2006) Dorothy Richardson’s Contribution to English Fiction, The Indian Review of World Literature in English [Internet] (Vol.2.1) available from: worldlitonline.net/jan-06/word/Dorothy.pdf accessed 25/10/10
Blake, A. (1998) Woolf's 'Mrs Dalloway.' (Novel by author Virginia Woolf).The Explicator [Internet] (56.n4)(pp209) available from http://find.galegroup.com/gtx/retrieve.do? Accessed 25/10/10
Collett, A. (2009) Sex and the City: Eliot and Woolf’s Vision of Post-WWI London; Virginia Woolf Miscellany [Internet] (Spring-Summer; 75) (10-13) accessed 25/10/10
Garcia, C. (2010)Decentring Discourse, Self-Centred Politics: Radicalism and the Self in Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Ingleses y Norteamericanos [Internet](32 :1) (15-28) accessed 25/10/10
Hale, D. (2009) The Art of English Fiction in the Twentieth Century in:
Caserio, R. ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Twentieth Century English Novel Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Littleton, J. (1995) Mrs' Dalloway': portrait of the artist as a middle-aged woman - novel by Virginia Woolf. Twentieth Century Literature [Internet](Spring) available from file:///C:/Users/weasel%20jem/Documents/uni/%27Mrs%27%20Dallowayr accessed 25/10/10
Lusin, C. (2008)Red Flowers and a Shabby Coat: Russian Literature and the Presentation of 'Madness’ in Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway Comparative Critical Studies [internet](5 ; 2-3) (p289-300)
Mackenzie, N., J., (1973) The Time Traveller The Life of HG Wells London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson
McClean, S. (2009) The Early Fiction of H G Wells New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan
Pennycook, A. (1998) English and the Discourses of Colonialism – London: Routledge
Scheick, W. (1984) The Splintering Frame: The Later Fiction of HG Wells – Canada: University of Victoria
Schwartz, S. (2003) Cosmic Anthropology: Race and reason in Out of the Silent Planet. Christianity and Literature [internet] (52.4) (p523) available from: http://find.galegroup.com/gtx/retrieve.do?content accessed: 25/10/10
Wells, H.G. (1901) The First Men in the Moon 4th ed. London and Glasgow: Fontana Books
Wells, H.G. (1902) Anticipations London: Chapman and Hall
Wells, H.G. (1911) The Contemporary Novel [Internet] available from: http://www.online-literature.com/wellshg/englishman-looks-at-the-world/11/ accessed 25/10/10
Woolf, V. (1996) Mrs Dalloway Great Britain: Wordsworth Classics
Woolf, V. (2008) Selected Essays 2nd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press
No comments:
Post a Comment